Episiotomy: beneficial for the doctor, the woman, or neither? Comparison with vaginal tear based on the complications of the technique

Authors

  • Agustina Campo Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud Carrera de Medicina. Buenos Aires, Argentina Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/shp2024132

Keywords:

episiotomy, anal sphincter, delivery, obstetrics, perineum

Abstract

Introduction: Episiotomy, a surgical incision in the perineum during vaginal delivery, has been used with the goal of reducing high-grade tears. However, currently its routine use has led to reconsidering the benefits of this technique, since it can lead to complications that, in some cases, can be avoided. On the other hand, vaginal tear is not always high grade and is not a necessary condition in a vaginal birth, so the deliberate use of episiotomy is not justified, which can, in the end, have more complications than what it is intended to avoid. Objectives: To analyze the complications of episiotomy compared to those of perineal tear. Material and methods: systematic review of articles published in the last 4 years.

References

1. Aguiar BM, Silva TPRD, Pereira SL, et al. Factors associated with the performance of episiotomy. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(suppl 4):e20190899. doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0899.

2. Alexander JW, Karantanis E, Turner RM, Faasse K, Watt C. Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):521-8. doi:10.1007/s00192-019-04003-x.

3. Bączek G, Rychlewicz S, Sys D, Rzońca P, Teliga-Czajkowska J. Episiotomy for medical indications during vaginal birth—retrospective analysis of risk factors determining the performance of this procedure. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4334. doi:10.3390/jcm11154334.

4. Hartinah A, Usman AN, Sartini, et al. Care for perineal tears in vaginal delivery: an update for midwife. Gac Sanit. 2021;35(Suppl 2):S216-20. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.024.

5. He S, Jiang H, Qian X, Garner P. Women's experience of episiotomy: a qualitative study from China. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e033354. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033354.

6. Klein MC, Kaczorowski J. Routine use of episiotomy with forceps should not be encouraged. CMAJ. 2020;192(8):E190. doi:10.1503/cmaj.74132.

7. Koh LM, van Roon Y, Pradhan A, Pathak S. Impact of the EPISCISSORS-60 mediolateral episiotomy scissors on obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a 2-year data review in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(9):1729-34. doi:10.1007/s00192-019-04201-7.

8. MacLellan J, Webb SS, Byrne C, et al. Informed consent in episiotomy: co-analysis with midwives and distillation of best practice. Birth. 2023;50(4):773-80. doi:10.1111/birt.12721.

9. Radnia N, Khansari S, Jiriaei N, Hosseini SA, Salemi L, Hamoon M. The relationship between perineal size and episiotomy during delivery. J Med Life. 2022;15(11):1379-83. doi:10.25122/jml-2021-0390.

10. Sultan AH, de Leeuw JW. Episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery: do we need more evidence? BJOG. 2021;128(10):1672-3. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16783.

11. Tantengco OAG, Velayo CL. Episiotomy practice and perineal trauma in the Philippines. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;19:100381. doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100381.

12. Zhang D, Bo K, Montejo R, et al. Influence of pelvic floor muscle training alone or as part of a general physical activity program during pregnancy on urinary incontinence, episiotomy and third- or fourth-degree perineal tear: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(6):1015-27. doi:10.1111/aogs.14744.

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Campo A. Episiotomy: beneficial for the doctor, the woman, or neither? Comparison with vaginal tear based on the complications of the technique. South Health and Policy [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 17];3:132. Available from: https://shp.ageditor.ar/index.php/shp/article/view/132