Impact of early administration of antibiotics in patients with sepsis and its prognoses

Authors

  • Lucas De Nicola Do Nascimento Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad De Medicina Y Ciencias De La Salud, Carrera De Medicina. Buenos Aires. Argentina. Author
  • Fernando Lipovestky Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad De Medicina Y Ciencias De La Salud, Carrera De Medicina. Buenos Aires. Argentina. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/shp2025193

Keywords:

sepsis, septic shock, early antibiotic administration, clinical outcomes, hospital length of stay

Abstract

Sepsis is a very complex medical condition resulting from a dysregulated inflammatory response of the host to an infectious condition, which can lead to organ dysfunction and, in the most critical cases, death. Early administration of antibiotics is crucial to improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. This study aims to evaluate the impact of early administration on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.
The objective is to evaluate the impact of early administration of antibiotics on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis, including mortality, length of hospital stay, and complications.
Materials and Methods: Data collection was performed through a search in online database such as: Pubmed, SCIELO, Google Scholar among others. The research will be composed of published and updated literatures showing the importance of early administration of antibiotics for the treatment of sepsis.
Results: The review of studies suggests a strong association between delays in antibiotic administration and increased in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. In the first study, it was observed that even administration within six hours showed an increasing risk of mortality with each hour of delay, this risk being particularly high in cases of septic shock. The second study confirmed this trend, with a median time to antibiotic administration of 2.1 hours. Mortality increased in proportion to the length of delay, with higher mortality rates in patients with septic shock compared to those with moderate sepsis. Each additional hour was associated with a marked increase in complications, highlighting the importance of immediate interventions to improve prognosis and reduce associated mortality.
Conclusion: In summary, the studies reviewed show that early administration of antibiotics is a key factor in improving clinical outcomes in sepsis, especially in severe cases. The establishment of clinical practices and guidelines that prioritize rapid intervention in patients with sepsis could contribute significantly to reducing mortality and complications associated with sepsis, that is, training health care personnel to identify probable cases of sepsis and septic shock in order to act quickly in the administration of antibiotics.

References

1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.

2. Wang X, Guo Z, Chai Y, Wang Z, Liao H, Wang Z, et al. Application prospect of the SOFA score and related modification research progress in sepsis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(10):3493.

3. Ichien BDT, Pacheco AD, Reyes DDJ. Eficacia de tres escalas pronósticas de mortalidad en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del HGR No. 20. Med Crit. 2022;36(2):101–6. doi:10.35366/104872.

4. Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD, et al. The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(7):856–63. doi:10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.

5. Sterling SA, Miller WR, Pryor J, Puskarich MA, Jones AE. The impact of timing of antibiotics on outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(9):1907–15. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142.

6. Vera Carrasco O. Sepsis y shock séptico. Cuad Hosp Clín. 2019;60(Esp):61–71. [citado 2024 nov 03].

7. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2235–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1703058.

8. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181–247. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.

9. Peltan ID, Brown SM, Bledsoe JR, et al. ED door-to-antibiotic time and long-term mortality in sepsis. Chest. 2019;155(5):938–46. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.008.

10. Bloos F, Rüddel H, Thomas-Rüddel D, et al. Effect of a multifaceted educational intervention for anti-infectious measures on sepsis mortality: a cluster randomized trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(11):1602–12. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4782-4.

11. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–96. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9.

12. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

How to Cite

1.
Do Nascimento LDN, Lipovestky F. Impact of early administration of antibiotics in patients with sepsis and its prognoses. South Health and Policy [Internet]. 2025 May 11 [cited 2025 Aug. 19];4:193. Available from: https://shp.ageditor.ar/index.php/shp/article/view/193